Approved tools and uses
What is allowed and who owns it.
AI Policy Review for Arizona Businesses
I help leadership decide which tools are approved, what information stays out, when human review is required, and who handles exceptions—then turn those decisions into a practical written policy.
Fixed-fee options: $3,000 for the review or $5,000 with a live leadership workshop. Target delivery within 15 business days after complete inputs, with final timing in the engagement letter.
Request an AI Policy ReviewCompare the Options
For qualifying Arizona businesses. Attorney-led guidance informed by hands-on work across widely used hosted, coding, agent, and locally run AI systems.
What You Receive
What is allowed and who owns it.
What must stay out.
What people verify and when they escalate.
Who approves exceptions and oversees use.
You receive one tailored policy or revision, a one-page approved tools and uses register, concise findings, and a human-review and escalation matrix.
Fixed-Fee Options
Choose the review for a small decision group; add the workshop when more leaders need practice and alignment.
$3,000 fixed fee
Best for a small leadership group ready to make the decisions.
$5,000 fixed fee
Best when up to eight leaders also need practice, shared ownership and escalation rules, and three 30-day actions.
Everything in AI Policy Review, plus
For qualifying Arizona businesses with ordinary internal generative-AI use. High-risk automated decisions, multi-state analysis, technical implementation, cybersecurity testing, incident response, and certification fall outside these packages.
Fit
The fixed fees cover one Arizona business using ordinary generative-AI tools internally. A business can be owner-led, professionally managed, small, or growing; fit depends on the number of tools and use cases, the materials to review, and the leadership decisions involved—not employee count.
Customer-facing systems, including website bots, high-impact, regulated, multi-state, enterprise, product or model, and technical implementation work may need separate scope.
Process
Step 1
I confirm the business, decision-maker, fit, and scope.
Step 2
You provide the questionnaire and included materials; I conduct the interview.
Step 3
I prepare the written work, then conduct the readout.
Step 4
One revision follows; the expanded option adds planning, the remote workshop, and follow-up.
Experience
I have worked hands-on with AI systems over several years and across multiple categories of tools. My experience includes ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini, Cursor, Grok, and Grok Bot, along with locally run models through Ollama. That breadth helps me translate policy language into practical decisions: which tools the business approves, what information stays out, when human review is required, how managers supervise employee use, and when an issue must be escalated.
This service provides legal policy review and leadership education. It does not include software deployment, cybersecurity testing, technical certification, or guaranteed compliance.
I am an Arizona attorney and former Pima County Justice of the Peace with civil-practice, judicial-clerkship, supply-chain, and financial-analysis experience. Civil litigation remains central to my firm’s work; this offering sits within my defined-scope Business Counsel practice.
For qualifying Arizona firms, a tailored review can address competence, client disclosure, and supervision. My hands-on use of hosted and locally run AI systems informs practical questions about confidentiality, verification, billing, supervision, and escalation in a law-practice setting. It does not certify ethics compliance.
Scope Boundaries
The packages exclude software deployment, configuration, procurement, technical implementation, cybersecurity or privacy audits, vendor security assessment, technical comparison, bias audit, incident response, breach investigation, high-risk automated-decision review, multi-state surveys, handbook overhauls, ongoing monitoring, ongoing training, implementation management, technical certification, compliance certification, and guarantees.
Additional businesses, jurisdictions, interviews, materials, tools or use cases, revisions, regulated systems, product or model governance, enterprise programs, or implementation work require separate written scope and fee confirmation. Remote workshop delivery is included. In-person delivery, participant travel, and expenses require separate written confirmation. The business is the client; workshop participants do not become individual clients.
FAQs
The $3,000 service includes one baseline policy for a qualifying business; an existing policy is reviewed and revised.
No. It is legal review, not certification, a technical audit, or a guarantee of acceptance.
Target: 15 business days after complete inputs; final timing is in the engagement letter. Workshop scheduling follows draft review.
No. It covers up to six ordinary tools or use cases. Technical configuration, security testing, and exhaustive vendor-term analysis require separate scope.
Sanitized exercises address policy use, human review, supervision, escalation, ownership, and three 30-day actions.
Yes. A tailored review for qualifying Arizona firms addresses confidentiality, verification, client communication, billing, supervision, and escalation; it does not certify ethics compliance.
No. The firm must complete conflicts and fit review, confirm scope, and accept an engagement.
Next Step
Do not send confidential, privileged, customer, employee, patient, financial, password, trade-secret, or other sensitive information through this form. Submitting an inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship. The firm must complete conflicts and fit review and accept a written engagement before providing legal services.